Skip to content
EMPOBase
en
Workflow

From a field submission to a result you can report

When review decisions are kept in separate files or messages, it can be difficult to tell which figure was approved.

The problem

Keep the submitted figure, its review decision and its source together for reporting.

Workflow

How the chain runs

Follow your team's work from submission to reviewed results.

  1. Who acts

    An authorised project MEAL lead

    Opens a collection link for a project indicator and period.

    What this protects

    Only authorised project staff can manage collection links.

    What it leaves behind
    A collection link your team can share and revoke.
    Next owner
    The field team or partner doing the counting.
  2. Who acts

    A field enumerator or partner

    Submits the value for that indicator and period through the link.

    What this protects

    Each submitted figure keeps its submitter, note and timestamp for review.

    What it leaves behind
    A submission with its submitter, note and timestamp.
    Next owner
    The reviewer for that project.
  3. Who acts

    An authorised project reviewer

    Reads the submitted value beside the current recorded actual, then approves or rejects it — with a note.

    What this protects

    Only staff authorised for this project can approve.

    What it leaves behind
    A decision recorded on the submission with its reviewer, timestamp and note.
    Next owner
    The results record itself.
  4. Who acts

    The system, on approval only

    Writes the approved value into the indicator actual for that project, indicator and period.

    What this protects

    Reports use approved figures with a clear record of their source.

    What it leaves behind
    An indicator actual carrying the source it came from.
    Next owner
    Reporting and rollups.
  5. Who acts

    Programme and MEAL reporting

    Reads the rollup across the project’s indicators.

    What this protects

    Reporting includes only approved indicators and accepted results.

    What it leaves behind
    A rollup built only from approved indicators and accepted actuals.
    Next owner
    End of the chain
Workflow

Controls in this workflow

Review these controls together with the scope and limitations below.

Approval access stays with your project team

Only authorised project staff can manage collection links. Only staff authorised for this project can approve.

Approved figures for reporting

Reports use approved figures with a clear record of their source.

Trace each result to its source

Each submitted figure keeps its submitter, note and timestamp for review.

A clear record of review decisions

Review decisions record who acted, when and any notes.

Workflow

What you end up holding

The records this chain produces — the ones an auditor or a donor will ask to see.

  • A submission register: every value that was ever offered, with its submitter, its decision, the reviewer and the note.
  • Indicator actuals updated by approved submissions in this workflow, with the source channel recorded.
  • Reporting includes only approved indicators and accepted results.
  • Field reports as a separate narrative record, with their own review chain and their own no-self-approval rule.
Workflow

Scope and availability

Review the supported uses and reporting boundaries with your team.

Not available today

  • Returns a collection submission to its submitter for revision.
  • Collection submissions support approval or rejection. Field reports have a separate review process, and authors cannot approve their own reports.
  • Field reports do not write indicator actuals. They are the narrative record. In this workflow, approved indicator submissions update the corresponding actuals.
  • Keep a dated copy of reported results for future review.
  • Totals are not unique reach. A sum of submitted values or distributed items is a count of transactions, not a count of distinct people, and nothing in this chain deduplicates beneficiaries.
  • A collection link is a web form with a token, not a system-to-system connector. There is no live integration with a third-party data-collection platform in this chain.
Workflow

About the images on this page

The three views on this page are captures of the current application running on synthetic seed data. There is no capture of the review decision itself yet; that step is described in text rather than mocked up.

Capture

Field reporting list with report types, dates and review states
Field reporting list with report types, dates and review states — current app, sample data. Open the full-size image

Capture

Programme results view showing indicators with targets and recorded actuals
Programme results view showing indicators with targets and recorded actuals — current app, sample data. Open the full-size image

Capture

MEAL overview strip summarising indicator coverage across projects
MEAL overview strip summarising indicator coverage across projects — current app, sample data. Open the full-size image
Explore with sample data

Request a walk-through of this workflow using sample data. Confirm the required plan and setup with us.